President Ronald Reagan meets his Taliban friends in the White House. “These gentlemen [Taliban] are the moral equivalents of America’s founding fathers.” — Ronald Regan while introducing the Mujahideen leaders to media on the White house lawns (1985).
President Ronald Reagan meets mujahideen in the White House.
This is a video of the missile hitting into the Pentagon. “Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, . FOIA request and released in a lawsuit – this video is Public Domain- War based on a lie by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, wolfowitz.
James Henry Fetzer: 9/11 Was Created by CIA, Neo-Cons – http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/12/james-henry-fetzer-911-was-created-by-cia-neo-cons/
The US CIA trained and armed ISIS. Dr Stan from the Genesis- communication network radio http://podcast.gcnlive.com/podcast/radio_lib/0911141.mp3
The US CIA trained and armed the Taliban during the Reagan/Bush years ISIS is like Iran/contra and President Bush Sr. pardoned all the Iran Contra criminals at the end of his first and only term as President in 1992 – such as Oliver North and let them out of Federal Jail.
Please download and save https://www.facebook.com/groups/ICCOTPCR00112207/ Evidence for the International Criminal Court of torture, murder, genocide INSIDE the USA and world by the Republican Party covering up 911 truth organizations globally. https://www.facebook.com/groups/ICCOTPCR00112207/files/
The Nazi Doctors, American Eugenics & Psychiatry Part 1 with Dr. John Breeding, Ph.D. Psychiatrists– The Men Behind Hitler: The Architects of Horror
by Thomas Roder “Psychiatrists – The Men Behind Hitler” http://psychdrugs.freedommag.org/page40.htm
http://www.cchr.org/about-us/cchr-accomplishments.html Accomplishments of the
Citizens Commission on Human Rights
Bringing Psychiatry to Justice for More than Four Decades
The Citizens Commision Commission on Human Rights has been on the front lines of mental health reform since 1969. Acknowledged by the Special Rapporteur to the United Nations Human Rights Commission as responsible for “many great reforms” that protect people from psychiatric abuse, CCHR has documented thousands of individual cases that demonstrate psychiatric drugs and often-brutal psychiatric practices create insanity and cause violence.
Over the course of more than four decades, CCHR’s work has helped to save the lives of millions and prevented needless suffering for millions more. Many countries have now mandated informed consent for psychiatric treatment and the right to legal representation, advocacy, recourse and compensation for patients. In some countries, the use of psychosurgery and electroshock on children is banned.
And with hundreds of chapters in 34 countries, CCHR members are active worldwide—organizing marches, public hearings, exhibits, and other actions to raise public awareness about the criminality rampant within psychiatry.
What follows, then, is a brief summary of CCHR’s many accomplishments:
Legal Rights & Informed Consent
In the early 1970s, CCHR’s investigations led to government inquiries into state psychiatric facilities in California, Illinois, Hawaii, Michigan and Missouri, thanks to the abuses CCHR had uncovered against patients. This resulted in hospital administrators and psychiatrists being dismissed, criminal and grand jury investigations being held, and closure of major psychiatric units due to the abuses.
In 1976, due to CCHR’s efforts, the first law to protect patients against enforced electroshock and psychosurgery was passed in California, providing informed consent and banning their use on children under the age of twelve. This became a model law, adopted in substance by legislatures across the United States and in other countries. In Texas, psychiatrists must also ensure that autopsy reports are done on any deaths within fourteen days of ECT administration.
In Italy, the birthplace of ECT, the Piemonte regional parliament responded to CCHR’s evidence by unanimously voting to ban the use of ECT on children, the elderly and pregnant women.
In the 1990s, CCHR helped uncover and expose the fact that up to 150 restraint deaths occur each year in the US alone, with nearly ten percent of these being children, some as young as six. Federal regulations were passed in 1999 that prohibited the use of physical and chemical (mind-altering drugs) restraints to coerce or discipline patients, ordered a “national reporting system” and cut government funding for any facility that did not comply.
In the 1980s/early 1990s, CCHR spearheaded a campaign to expose and ban Deep Sleep Treatment (DST) at Chelmsford Private Psychiatric Hospital in Sydney, Australia. The “treatment” involved knocking the patient unconscious for three weeks with a cocktail of psychiatric drugs and electroshocking them daily, without their consent. It killed 48 people. CCHR achieved its ban under the Mental Health Act and it is a criminal offense for psychiatrists to administer it. CCHR also obtained the country’s highest level of government inquiry into DST and mental health, leading to significant reforms.
Protecting Children’s Rights
Working with journalists, CCHR helped investigate and subsequently expose the fact that numerous school shooters had been under the influence of psychiatric drugs documented to cause violence, suicide and mania, resulting in state hearings investigating this issue and national press coverage on the link between senseless acts of violence and psychiatric drugs.
CCHR also documented numerous cases of parents being coerced/pressured or forced to give their children psychiatric drugs as a condition of attending school, including parents charged with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a drug documented to cause suicide and violence. By working with parents, doctors and numerous civil and human rights advocates, this issue was exposed in the national media, was brought before state and federal legislators and resulted in the 2004 passage of the prohibition on forcing parents to put their children on psychiatric drugs.
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child responded to reports from CCHR Finland, Australia and Denmark, expressing concerns that ADHD and ADD “are being misdiagnosed and therefore psychostimulant drugs are being over-prescribed, despite growing evidence of the harmful effects of these drugs.” The Committee recommended, “other forms of management and treatment be used as much as possible to address these behavioral disorders.”
In 1991, largely due to CCHR’s efforts, the FDA held hearings into the antidepressant drug Prozac, where dozens of consumers testified that the drug had turned people with no previous history of psychosis, suicidal and homicidal. Due to the vested interests of the voting FDA board members, no action was taken to protect the public until nearly thirteen years later when CCHR’s more than ten-year campaign to expose the dangers of these drugs came to fruition, and the FDA (under pressure from Congress) finally issued the agencies strongest warning that antidepressants can cause suicidal thoughts and actions in those 18 years of age and younger. This was later extended to age 24.
In 2007, working with whistleblowers, parents and consumer groups, CCHR helped secure language in the FDA reform bill that makes it mandatory for all pharmaceutical ads to advise patients to report drug adverse reactions directly to the FDA. Following the first ads being published, the number of Adverse Drug Reports increased by thirty-three percent.
Human Rights Secured
CCHR photographed and then exposed secret psychiatric “slave labor” camps in South Africa where tens of thousands of Africans were incarcerated in the 1970s and ’80s, against their will, in disused mining compounds, were drugged and subjected to painful electroshock without anaesthetics. The apartheid government responded in 1976 by banning the photographing or dissemination of any information about psychiatric institutions, at which point CCHR obtained a World Health Organization investigation that substantiated CCHR’s allegations. When apartheid ended, CCHR presented oral and written testimony to South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission investigating apartheid crimes and obtained a national government inquiry into psychiatric racism. The government repealed the ban on disclosing information about psychiatric abuse.
CCHR in Germany conducted comprehensive research that established conclusively that Germany’s leading psychiatrists provided the theory as well as the “scientific” justification for the Nazi government to destroy “life unworthy of living.” Euthanasia was first piloted in psychiatric institutions before being exported to the concentration camps. Many Nazi psychiatrists escaped justice at the Nuremberg Trials and continued practicing after the war. In 1995 CCHR published the acclaimed book Psychiatrists: The Men Behind Hitler. Four years later, the German Psychiatric Association issued a report affirming that psychiatrists were “active in and primarily responsible for the different euthanasia organizations. They guided and directed the different euthanasia campaigns.” They “observed and controlled the selection of those to be killed.”
CCHR extensively researched ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Kosovo, reporting its findings to the UN War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague and the Council of Europe. It discovered that psychiatric ideas of racial hygiene and eugenics were behind the conflict, in particular the works of Jovan Rašković, founder of the Social Democratic Party and Radovan Karadžić, wartime leader—both psychiatrists. In 1999, members of the Council of Europe issued a resolution that recognized psychiatrists as the architects of the ethnic cleansing and encouraged Council members to “study the material that has been put together and researched by the French chapter of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.” When Karadžić was captured in 2008, it was widely reported that Karadžić’s ethnic cleansing stemmed from his psychiatric background.
Along with officials and members of the Italian Parliament, CCHR Italy inspected concentration camp-like conditions in the country’s psychiatric asylums. Staff had pocketed government funds while patients were left naked and starving. The government responded to the evidence, issuing a resolution that ordered the closure of the ninety-seven asylums. The abused and neglected inmates were transferred to humane homes, many taught to read, write and care for themselves for the first time in thirty years. CCHR was presented with a mayoral medal for its humanitarian efforts.
Exposing Criminal Psychiatric Abuse
CCHR has campaigned for uncompromising execution of justice for mental health practitioners who rape or sexually abuse their patients, but hide behind their roles as therapists to mitigate their crimes. In protecting patients from sexual abuse and fraud the following are a sample of safeguards achieved:
At least twenty-five statutes have been enacted defining sex crimes committed by psychiatrists and psychologists in the United States, Australia, Germany, Sweden and Israel. The laws label therapist-patient sex as sexual assault or rape. Hundreds of psychiatrists and psychologists have been convicted and jailed.
CCHR’s investigations led to a major private psychiatric hospital chain in the US being investigated by fourteen federal and state investigations for fraud and patient abuse. Before closing, the hospital chain paid out over $1 billion in criminal and civil fines. Laws were subsequently passed outlawing the practice of using “bounty hunters” for locating individuals with good insurance in order to involuntarily institutionalize them in psychiatric facilities and milk their insurance dry.
Numerous other private, for-profit psychiatric hospitals were subsequently investigated. By 2003, state and federal authorities had eighty percent of the US private psychiatric hospital market under criminal investigation, which resulted in $2.1 billion in criminal and civil fines.
FBI Whistleblower: Pentagon, CIA, NATO and MI6 Were Masterminds Behind 9/11
Posted on September 11, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
“As Far As People Who Ran The Show, It Was The Highest Levels of NATO, the U.S., MI6, CIA And The Pentagon”
Sibel Edmonds has just released her fantastic spy thriller, The Lone Gladio. Here’s our review, comparing it to the best of Clancy or Ludlum … but with a twist.
In the real world, Edmonds is a former FBI translator who translated terror-related communications for the FBI right after 9/11. In that capacity, she read communications between terrorists and other radicals.
Edmonds has been deemed credible by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General, several senators (free subscription required), and a coalition of prominent conservative and liberal groups.
The ACLU described Edmonds as:
The most gagged person in the history of the United States of America.
Famed Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg says that Edmonds possesses information “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers”. He also says that the White House has ordered the press not to cover Edmonds:
I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel [Edmonds]?
The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told “don’t touch this . . . .”
Even Paul Newman praises Edmonds, saying:
Sibel Edmonds would not let an intimidating FBI shut her mouth, and as a result, suffered grievous consequences, but she has persevered and we are better off for her sacrifices.
Edmonds is the founder and president of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, a group of high-level national intelligence and security officials.
To understand why Edmonds’ information is so explosive, we need a little background on “Operation Gladio.”
Background: “Operation Gladio”
The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries from the 1950′s through the 1990′s, and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).
This was codenamed “Operation Gladio”. And watch this BBC special. And see this for the big picture background.
Operation Gladio Continues to this Day
Edmonds told Washington’s Blog that she wrote The Lone Gladio because the FBI classified 100% of her previous book, Classified Woman. When she found out that she doesn’t need to get pre-publication approval for “novels”, she decided to write a novel.
So Edmonds decided to write a work of fiction based on the real-life operation- ‘Operation Gladio B’ – as the context, and with fictional events and characters in the novel The Lone Gladio.
[WASHINGTON’S BLOG]: You’ve previously claimed that Gladio was not terminated with the fall of the Soviet Union, but has continued up until today … the so-called “Gladio B”.
[SIBEL EDMONDS]: Yes. The title “Gladio B” was given by the FBI, because we don’t know what they really call it.
NATO, MI6, MIT (the Turkish military and intelligence service), and the Pentagon, also some outside rogue elements connected with Gladio.
[WASHINGTON’S BLOG]: Did you see – when you were still with the FBI – source documents about this so-called “Gladio B”? In The Lone Gladio, you have a “fictitious” set of memos that have players from NATO, the U.S. State Department and high-level terrorists meeting together. Did you see documents like that when you were at FBI?
[SIBEL EDMONDS]: Yes. I reviewed over 5,000 documents. Not only from FBI’s Washington office. A lot of documents came from FBI’s Chicago office. The document were from the period 1996 through February 2002. There were written documents, and audio translated by FBI translators.
[WASHINGTON’S BLOG]: Were NATO personnel actually mentioned in some of the documents or transcripts you saw as being part of these Gladio B meetings?
[SIBEL EDMONDS]: A number of generals were involved. Both U.S. generals and British generals and other generals involved with NATO. And many recognizable, public names with the U.S. State Department.
Most of this involved people from and State Department and the CIA. These are at the top levels … you’re not going to get operative-level involved with this.
Edmonds explained that the State Department doesn’t just deploy “soft power”, but is involved in many “hard power” operations, often coordinating through well-known “Non-Governmental Organizations” (NGOs).
Specifically, Edmonds explained that numerous well-known NGOs – which claim to focus on development, birth control, women’s rights, fighting oppression and other “magnificent sounding” purposes or seemingly benign issues – act as covers for State Department operations. [Background.] She said that the State Department directly places operatives inside the NGOs.
As one example, Edmonds said that – during the late 90s and early 2000s – perhaps 30-40% of the people working for NGOs operated by George Soros were actually working for the U.S. State Department.
Edmonds also said that Osama Bin Laden – and several other members of his family – were working with U.S. agencies as part of Gladio B right up until 9/11. Edmonds notes that Bin Laden and his family members were helping the West set up terrorist groups in Chechnya up until 9/11.
Edmonds also said that the FBI failed to prosecute any of the criminal activities occurring in the United States as revealed by these documents.
9/11 Was Part of Gladio
Back to our interview …
[WASHINGTON’S BLOG]: In terms of 9/11, what’s your opinion about whether there were countries involved, or whether it was rogue Gladio personnel?
[SIBEL EDMONDS]: You have to separate the pawns from the main players. There might have been elements involved within countries: for example Prince Bandar in Saudi Arabia, or Turkish people at the MIT.
But the people who ran the show at the top were NATO and Gladio. And Gladio was under the U.S. It was – and is – an operation under the U.S., for U.S. empire.
As far as people who ran the show, it was the highest levels of NATO, the U.S., MI6, CIA and the Pentagon.
The Goal: Control of Eurasia, Oil and Other Resources
Edmonds says that the entire focus of the U.S. and these related groups is to control the world’s resources, such as oil and gas pipelines in Eurasia.
She explained that many of the people in Eurasian region speak Turkic languages. For that reason, Turkey and its intelligence service – MIT – has been a major conduit for Gladio operations. And since a lot of the resources are in former Soviet countries, a lot of Gladio’s focus has been in those countries.
Postscript: Edmonds has previously stated that Bin Laden – and his number 2 Al Qaeda lieutenant – Ayman al-Zawahiri – worked with the U.S. government for 3 months AFTER 9/11 to coordinate destablization in the Caucus region.
And she previously told Washington’s Blog:
For the past 11 years I have been emphasizing that my State Secrets Privilege & Gag Orders had to do with the FBI files (covering period 1996-2002 February) on covert-terrorist operations in Caucasus and Central Asia backed, managed and armed by US actors. These US-NATO directed operations in the region involved Bin-Laden and mainly Zawahiri …..
The FBI documents contained damning evidence (audio and written) collected between 1996-2002 tying these terror operations directly to the U.S. persons in the State Department/CIA and Pentagon. Also, how the State Department got Congress to grant huge amounts of funds to “front’ NGOs and businesses (mainly Turkish companies in US-listed/members of ATC) to funnel money to the terrorist cells in this region.
If you want to hear Edmonds name some names, watch part 1 and part 2 of her interview with James Corbett.
ames Henry Fetzer: 9/11 was created by CIA, Neo-Cons and the Mossad
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on pinterest_share
More Sharing Services
James Henry Fetzer: 9/11 was created by CIA, Neo-Cons and the Mossad
Interview by Javad Arab Shirazi
TEHRAN (FNA)–James Henry Fetzer, an American political commentator, believes that 9/11 was created by CIA, the Neo-Cons in the US Department of Defense and the Mossad.
“9/11 was brought to us by the CIA, the Neo-Cons in the Department of Defense (most of whom were from Project for the New American Century), which believed that, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a unique historical opportunity for the US to build a world-wide empire that would endure for the next 100 years, if only we would move aggressively into the Middle East and project military and diplomatic influence outward from that geopolitically sensitive region, and the Mossad. It hasn’t played out that way, but that was the plan. The chaos with Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan continues unabated with Iran as the ultimate objective,” James Henry Fetzer said in an exclusive interview with Fars News Agency on the advent of the 13th anniversary of 9/11 attacks.
“We have massive proof that the Twin Towers were blown apart and did not collapse, which appears to have been done using a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes. It was not even possible that It could have collapsed, given its design and construction. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition. All four of the airplane “crash sites” were faked or fabricated, albeit each in its own way. None of them actually crashed, which means that no passengers abroad died in crashes. And no “suicide hijackers” were aboard them to cause them to crash, which means that the whole “War on Terror” was based on a false premise. 9/11 was staged to create a pretext for wars of aggression,” he added.
James Henry Fetzer is an American philosopher of science and conspiracy theorist. He is an editor at Veterans Today and co-founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
What follows is the full text of the interview:
Q: As you know 9/11 conspiracy theories attribute the planning and executions of the September 11 attacks to certain parties or claim there was an advance knowledge of the attacks among high-level government officials. Possible motives claimed by conspiracy theorists of such actions include justifying the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as well as geostrategic interests in the Middle-East. What’s your take on that?
A: To understand 9/11, we must return to the dissolution of the USSR in 1990-91, which left the US military-industrial-intelligence complex without an international boogeyman to motivate the American people to continue to support vast expenditures on bombs, planes and tanks. A shadowy and elusive “terrorist organization” in the Middle East was the perfect replacement, especially since “terrorist attacks” could be arranged almost anywhere at almost anytime and, if the government declared that it was the work of “terrorists”, who would be in the position to contradict them?
The master plan was to draw the United States into endless wars in the Middle East on behalf of Israel, where no American interests were at stake. In the past, the stability of the region was viewed as paramount to guarantee the uninterrupted flow of oil from stable but despotic regimes. Indeed, no rational soul today would claim that Iraq, for example, is better off now than it was under Saddam Hussein, whose blunder may have been to abandon the petro-dollar. Gaining a foothold for international bankers in a region dominated by Islam, which tends to eschew usury, was another powerful motive.
Q: As we approach the 13th anniversary of the September 11th attacks, there still exists an almost complete blackout in mainstream media of the voluminous forensic evidence that demands an immediate and independent new investigation of that determining day. If the American people were to demand a new investigation into the 9/11, a common criticism would be that the government is not very good at investigating itself and when it does so, historically it usually either absolves itself of any alleged crimes or finds convenient scapegoats in the form of either patsies or CIA sponsored boogeymen. What in your mind would be required for a new investigation to be successful and to actually lead to some type of reform of the system?
A: The desire for a “new investigation” of 9/11 sounds like a great idea, but we could expect exactly the same outcome as the “new investigation” of JFK conducted by the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1977-78, which led to its Final Report in 1979. In many ways, it was redoing the cover-up but doing it better than had the original Warren Report of 1964. By ignoring the massive blow-out at the back of the head reported by the Parkland physicians (which was fist-sized) and even the much larger wound at Bethesda (enlarged with a cranial saw to make it look more like a shot from behind) and reducing it to a small entry wound at the top of the head, they replaced a bad investigation with one that was even worse.
We have massive proof that the Twin Towers were blown apart and did not collapse, which appears to have been done using a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes. It was not even possible that it could have collapsed, given its design and construction. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition. All four of the airplane “crash sites” were faked or fabricated, albeit each in its own way. None of them actually crashed, which means that no passengers aboard died in crashes. And no “suicide hijackers” were aboard them to cause them to crash, which means that the whole “War on Terror” was based on a false premise. 9/11 was staged to create a pretext for wars of aggression.
YouTube – Veterans Today –
Q: The US authorities described the event as coordinated terrorist attacks launched by Al-Qaeda and later claimed that Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind behind the attacks. Then American intelligence forces purportedly carried out a mission codenamed “Operation Neptune Spear” which led to Osama’s death. What do you think? Who did really orchestrate the 9/11?
A: 9/11 was brought to us by the CIA, the Neo-Cons in the Department of Defense (most of whom were from Project for the New American Century), which believed that, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a unique historical opportunity for the US to build a world-wide empire that would endure for the next 100 years, if only we would move aggressively into the Middle East and project military and diplomatic influence outward from that geopolitically sensitive region, and the Mossad. It hasn’t played out that way, but that was the plan. The chaos with Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan continues unabated with Iran as the ultimate objective.
The changes in US foreign policy were complemented by subversion of the Constitution in implementing the misnamed PATRIOT Act, which has profoundly altered American society into a surveillance state in which freedom of speech and of expression has been severely constrained. History will record its gross misadventure into the Middle East as the last dying gasps of an empire that has depleted its military and expended its treasury for an unattainable goal, leaving an enormous swath of death and devastation in its wake. I wish the situation was more promising, but nothing good for human beings is about to emerge.
Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11 as he observed at the time. He was “our man in Afghanistan” and was visited by a CIA agent when hospitalized in Dubai not long before he died on 15 December 2001, which has been addressed by Nicholas Kollerstrom, “Osama bin Laden: 1957-2001″ and David Ray Griffin, OSAMA BIN LADEN: DEAD OR ALIVE? It was politically beneficial to Barack Obama to resurrect him and kill him again, as I have explained in “Zero Dark Thirty; The deeper, darker truths”. American politics, sad to say, has become little more than a theater of the absurd.
Q: Do you believe there is a connection between 9/11 attacks and appearance of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)? Is ISIL an offshoot of the 9/11?
A: The ISIL phenomenon, which includes fake beheadings of journalist with real destruction of religious icons, has been astonishing in its apparent rapidity. Recent reports that its leader is an agent of the Mossad are illuminating, since, given the Assad government’s success in routing the rebels there, suggests that the forces who want to create instability in the region by removing secular leaders and allowing ancient and deep faith-based antagonisms to reassert themselves can only work to the benefit of Israel. New claims from the American government (that it might take three years to suppress ISIL) hint that we are being taken for a ride to create an excuse to use NATO forces to depose Assad and perform other mischief there.
So this appears to be one more ruse to destabilize the Middle East for the benefit of Israel. It is stunning how much terror and destruction has been wrong by that small state and its advocates, going back to the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 by Irgun terrorists dressed as Arabs, the air attack on the USS Liberty, the false flags on the Israeli Embassy and the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994, and even attempts to blame the Palestinians for the atrocities of 9/11. The world has now been reminded of the savage nature of its government by the recent slaughter of the Palestinian people, which destroyed 40% of the land they control. Aggression by the US and Israel justifiably deserve the world’s condemnation.
Dr. Jim Fetzer- https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjiyOvDo2uA&list=PL4Bf7kee0wmOnPRKzlbK6obBi-kpz6NNY For more, go to radiofetzer.blogspot.com.